From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hornstein v. Barry

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Feb 19, 1988
537 A.2d 1131 (D.C. 1988)

Opinion

No. 83-242.

February 19, 1988.

Burton A. Schwalb, Washington, D.C., for appellants.

Charles L. Reischel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, for appellees.

Before PRYOR, Chief Judge, MACK, NEWMAN, FERREN*, BELSON, TERRY*, ROGERS, and STEADMAN, Associate Judges, and REILLY*, Senior Judge.

Associate Judge Rogers has recused herself from this case.


ORDER

On consideration of appellees' petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc, and the response thereto, it is

ORDERED by the merits division* that the petition for rehearing is denied; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc, it is

FURTHER ORDERED that appellees' petition for rehearing en banc is granted and that the opinion and judgment of September 11, 1987, 530 A.2d 1177, are hereby vacated. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall schedule this matter for argument before the court sitting en banc as soon as the business of the court permits. Counsel are hereby directed to provide ten copies of the briefs heretofore filed to the Clerk on or before February 29, 1988.


Summaries of

Hornstein v. Barry

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Feb 19, 1988
537 A.2d 1131 (D.C. 1988)
Case details for

Hornstein v. Barry

Case Details

Full title:David HORNSTEIN, et al., Appellants, v. Marion BARRY, et al., Appellees

Court:District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Date published: Feb 19, 1988

Citations

537 A.2d 1131 (D.C. 1988)