From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hornsby v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Jan 9, 2006
No. 05-04-01796-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 9, 2006)

Opinion

No. 05-04-01796-CR

Opinion Filed January 9, 2006. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P. 47.

On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. F04-48368-IV. Affirmed.

Before Justices MOSELEY, RICHTER, and LANG-MIERS.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


A jury found Lonnie Hornsby guilty of aggravated robbery. The jury assessed punishment at ten years' imprisonment. Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant he has a right to file a pro se response, but appellant did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court's judgment.


Summaries of

Hornsby v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Jan 9, 2006
No. 05-04-01796-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 9, 2006)
Case details for

Hornsby v. State

Case Details

Full title:LONNIE HORNSBY, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Jan 9, 2006

Citations

No. 05-04-01796-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 9, 2006)