From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hornsby v. Hipp

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ROCK HILL DIVISION
Aug 6, 2012
C.A. No.: 0:11-01749-RBH (D.S.C. Aug. 6, 2012)

Opinion

C.A. No.: 0:11-01749-RBH

08-06-2012

Christopher Dean Hornsby, Plaintiff, v. Debroah Hipp, Defendant


ORDER

The plaintiff, Christopher Dean Hornsby, a self-represented pretrial detainee, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter is before the court for review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett, made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 73.02 for the District of South Carolina.

The Magistrate Judge makes only a recommendation to this court. The recommendation has no presumptive weight. The responsibility to make a final determination remains with this court. See Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270-71 (1976). The court is charged with making a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which specific objection is made, and the court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge or recommit the matter with instructions. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

Neither party has filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. In the absence of objections to the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, this court is not required to give any explanation for adopting the recommendation. See Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983). The Court reviews only for clear error in the absence of an objection. See Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310 (4th Cir. 2005) stating that "in the absence of a timely filed objection, a district court need not conduct de novo review, but instead must 'only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.'" (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 advisory committee's note).

After a thorough review of the record in this case, the Court finds no clear error. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted and incorporated by reference. Therefore, it is

ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. # 46] is GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________

R. Bryan Harwell

United States District Judge

Florence, South Carolina

August 6, 2012


Summaries of

Hornsby v. Hipp

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ROCK HILL DIVISION
Aug 6, 2012
C.A. No.: 0:11-01749-RBH (D.S.C. Aug. 6, 2012)
Case details for

Hornsby v. Hipp

Case Details

Full title:Christopher Dean Hornsby, Plaintiff, v. Debroah Hipp, Defendant

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ROCK HILL DIVISION

Date published: Aug 6, 2012

Citations

C.A. No.: 0:11-01749-RBH (D.S.C. Aug. 6, 2012)