From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Horning v. Martel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 18, 2012
No. CIV S-10-1932 JAM GGH (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2012)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-1932 JAM GGH

01-18-2012

DANNY RAY HORNING, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL MARTEL, Respondent.


DEATH PENALTY CASE


ORDER

On November 28, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed November 28, 2011, are adopted in full; and

2. Petitioner's motion to stay this federal proceeding pending exhaustion of new claims in state court (docket #29) is granted.

John A. Mendez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Horning v. Martel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 18, 2012
No. CIV S-10-1932 JAM GGH (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2012)
Case details for

Horning v. Martel

Case Details

Full title:DANNY RAY HORNING, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL MARTEL, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 18, 2012

Citations

No. CIV S-10-1932 JAM GGH (E.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2012)

Citing Cases

Bunyard v. Davis

The petitioner need only establish that a Rhines stay is appropriate for one of its unexhausted claims since,…