From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Horn v. Washington

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Jan 19, 2024
No. 22-11844 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 19, 2024)

Opinion

22-11844

01-19-2024

Stephen Lee Horn, III, Plaintiff, v. Heidi Washington, et al., Defendants.


David R. Grand Mag. Judge

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [31]

JUDITH E. LEVY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Grand's Report and Recommendation recommending the Court grant Defendant's motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 31.) The parties were required to file specific written objections, if any, within 14 days of service. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(2); E.D. Mich. L.R. 72.1(d). No objections were filed. The Court has nevertheless carefully reviewed the Report and Recommendation and concurs in the reasoning and result. Accordingly, The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 31) is ADOPTED;

Defendant's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 21) is GRANTED; and

This case is hereby DISMISSED.

By failing to object to the Report and Recommendation, the parties have forfeited any further right of appeal. United States v. Wandahsega, 924 F.3d 868, 878 (6th Cir. 2019); see also Berkshire v. Beauvais, 9 28 F.3d 520, 530 (6th Cir. 2019).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Horn v. Washington

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Jan 19, 2024
No. 22-11844 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 19, 2024)
Case details for

Horn v. Washington

Case Details

Full title:Stephen Lee Horn, III, Plaintiff, v. Heidi Washington, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Jan 19, 2024

Citations

No. 22-11844 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 19, 2024)