From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Horn v. Kraft Heinz Foods Co.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 7, 2021
1:21-cv-01258-NE-BAM (E.D. Cal. Sep. 7, 2021)

Opinion

1:21-cv-01258-NE-BAM

09-07-2021

Alex Horn, Lance Aytman, and Keith Hooker Plaintiffs v. Kraft Heinz Foods Company LLC Defendants


APPLICATION FOR PRO HAC VICE AND PROPOSED ORDER

Barbara A. McAuliffe Judge

Pursuant to Local Rule 180(b)(2) of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Rebecca Ojserkishereby applies for permission to appear and participate as counsel in the above entitled action on behalf of the following party or parties: Alex Horn, Lance Aytman, and Keith Hooker

On 08/09/202 (date), I was admitted to practice and presently in good standing in the State of Maryland(court). A certificate of good standing from that court is submitted in conjunction with this application. I have not been disbarred or formally censured by a court of record or by a state bar association; and there are not disciplinary proceedings against me.

[ ] I have [√] I have not concurrently or within the year preceding this application made a pro hac vice application to this court. (If you have made a pro hac vice application to this court within the last year, list the name and No. of each matter in which an application was made, the date of application and whether granted or denied.)

ORDER

The Pro Hac Vice Application is APPROVED. The Pro Hac Vice Attorney is DIRECTED to request filing access through PACER.


Summaries of

Horn v. Kraft Heinz Foods Co.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 7, 2021
1:21-cv-01258-NE-BAM (E.D. Cal. Sep. 7, 2021)
Case details for

Horn v. Kraft Heinz Foods Co.

Case Details

Full title:Alex Horn, Lance Aytman, and Keith Hooker Plaintiffs v. Kraft Heinz Foods…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 7, 2021

Citations

1:21-cv-01258-NE-BAM (E.D. Cal. Sep. 7, 2021)