October 1, 1957
Orders unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. The complaint sufficiently alleges and the plaintiff should be given an opportunity to prove that he would have completed the successful negotiations and sale had not the defendants prevented him from doing so by their tortious conduct.
Concur — Peck, P.J., Breitel, Botein, Rabin and Frank, JJ.
Full title:NATHANIEL M. HORN, Respondent, v. ISBRANDTSEN COMPANY, INC., et al.…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Date published: Oct 1, 1957
The questions involved are as simple as the plan conceived and executed by defendants. The first question is…
Katz v. ThompsonConspiracy of itself does not add to the tort ( Green v. Davies, 182 N.Y. 499; Brackett v. Griswold, 112 N.Y.…