Summary
denying in part a prisoner's motion to amend his complaint to assert a claim that unnamed defendants had acted "in concert or participation" with named defendants
Summary of this case from Gould v. Williams Cnty.Opinion
Case No. 07-10116.
October 16, 2007
ORDER
On June 13, 2007, the Court granted Plaintiff in forma pauperis (IFP) status, and ordered service of the complaint and summons by the U.S. Marshal. The Court has since granted, in part, Plaintiff's motion to file an amended complaint that adds new Defendants, some of whom are not public employees. In order to effect service, the Court requires the addresses of these Defendants.
Accordingly, within 30 days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall send to the Court the business addresses of the following Defendants:
Secure Care, Inc.
Dr. Joseph Natole, Jr., M.D.
SO ORDERED.