From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

HORACEK v. NEPH

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division — Flint
Feb 26, 2008
CASE NO.:4:07-CV-13006 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 26, 2008)

Opinion

CASE NO.:4:07-CV-13006.

February 26, 2008


ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO ALLOW THE TAKING OF PLAINTIFF'S DEPOSITION IN PRISON, (Dkt. #14)


This matter is before the Court on the Defendant's Motion to Allow the Taking of Plaintiff's Deposition in Prison, (Dkt. #14) filed on February 22, 2008. In support of the motion, the Defendant states that as part of the discovery process in this matter, Defendant needs to take the deposition of the Plaintiff who is incarcerated. Defendant further states that the institution in which the Plaintiff is housed also requires a written court order to allow a deposition of a prisoner.

Pursuant to Rule 30(a)(2), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, leave of court is required to take the deposition of an individual who is incarcerated and shall be granted to the extent consistent with the principles as outlined in Rule 26(b)(2).

Having considered the motion, the motion to allow the deposition of the prisoner is hereby GRANTED. The deposition of the Plaintiff shall take place at a date and time as agreed upon by the parties and correctional facility, but prior to the close of discovery.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

The parties are hereby informed that any objections to this order must be filed with the district court within ten days after service, pursuant to Rule 72(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.


Summaries of

HORACEK v. NEPH

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division — Flint
Feb 26, 2008
CASE NO.:4:07-CV-13006 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 26, 2008)
Case details for

HORACEK v. NEPH

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL HORACEK #218347, Plaintiff(s), v. JOHN NEPH, Defendant(s)

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division — Flint

Date published: Feb 26, 2008

Citations

CASE NO.:4:07-CV-13006 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 26, 2008)