From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Horacek v. Eberly

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Sep 29, 2006
Case No. 04-73929 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 29, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 04-73929.

September 29, 2006


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Paul J. Komives' Report and Recommendation dated August 30, 2006. Plaintiff has not filed any objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.

Magistrate Judge Komives recommended that the Court grant Defendants' motion to tax costs against Plaintiff and in favor of Defendants in the amount of $57.50 . Additionally, the Magistrate Judge noted that if Plaintiff is unable to pay the costs in full, this Court may set forth a payment schedule pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2) and (f)(2)(B). After careful review and consideration, the Court finds that the Magistrate Judge reached the correct conclusion for the proper reasons. The Court considers the September 28, 2005 judgment as allowing costs and accepts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation regarding costs and attorney fees. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Paul J. Komvies' [Docket No. 36, filed August 30, 2006] is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED as this Court's findings and conclusions of law.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff is unable to pay the amount of $57.50 in full, he may pay costs to the Defendants on a payment schedule as set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2) and (f)(2)(B).


Summaries of

Horacek v. Eberly

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Sep 29, 2006
Case No. 04-73929 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 29, 2006)
Case details for

Horacek v. Eberly

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL HORACEK, Plaintiff, v. JILL EBERLY, LYNNE ADAMS, WILLIAM STIVERSON…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Sep 29, 2006

Citations

Case No. 04-73929 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 29, 2006)