From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Horace v. Fischer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Sep 13, 2012
98 A.D.3d 1157 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-09-13

In the Matter of Keith HORACE, Petitioner, v. Brian FISCHER, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

Keith Horace, Gouverneur, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.


Keith Horace, Gouverneur, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.
Before: PETERS, P.J., LAHTINEN, SPAIN, STEIN and McCARTHY, JJ.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the *604Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the $5 mandatory surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. In view of this and given that petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot ( see Matter of Garner v. Bezio, 95 A.D.3d 1585, 943 N.Y.S.2d 923 [2012];Matter of Torres v. Bezio, 92 A.D.3d 1053, 937 N.Y.S.2d 900 [2012] ). Contrary to petitioner's claim, he is not entitled to be restored to the status he enjoyed prior to the disciplinary determination ( see Matter of Abdul–Malik v. Palin, 85 A.D.3d 1413, 924 N.Y.S.2d 859 [2011] ).

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

PETERS, P.J., LAHTINEN, SPAIN, STEIN and McCARTHY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Horace v. Fischer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Sep 13, 2012
98 A.D.3d 1157 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Horace v. Fischer

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Keith HORACE, Petitioner, v. Brian FISCHER, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Sep 13, 2012

Citations

98 A.D.3d 1157 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 6170
950 N.Y.S.2d 603

Citing Cases

Whitley v. Fischer

The Attorney General has informed this Court that the determination has been reversed administratively, all…

Houghtaling v. Fischer

Accordingly, given that petitioner has received all of the relief to which he is entitled, the petition is…