From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

HORA v. CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON FINANCIAL CORPORATION

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Mar 9, 2011
Case No.: 2:09-cv-02267-GMN-PAL (D. Nev. Mar. 9, 2011)

Opinion

Case No.: 2:09-cv-02267-GMN-PAL.

March 9, 2011


ORDER


Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 39) of the Honorable Peggy A. Leen, United States Magistrate Judge, entered December 22, 2010, in which Magistrate Judge Leen recommended that Plaintiffs' Complaint be dismissed by January 3, 2011, if Plaintiffs had not yet retained counsel or filed a notice that they will be proceeding pro se. No objections have been filed, nor have Plaintiffs retained counsel or filed a notice that they intend to proceed pro se.

The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record in this case in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule IB 1-4, and has determined that Magistrate Judge Leen's Recommendation should be ACCEPTED. Because Plaintiffs have not yet retained counsel or filed a notice that they intend to appear pro se, Plaintiffs' Complaint is DISMISSED and the Lis Pendens is RELEASED.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Leen's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 39) is ACCEPTED. Plaintiff's Complaint is therefore DISMISSED with prejudice and the Lis Pendens is RELEASED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other pending Motions are DENIED as moot.

DATED this 9th day of March, 2011.


Summaries of

HORA v. CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON FINANCIAL CORPORATION

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Mar 9, 2011
Case No.: 2:09-cv-02267-GMN-PAL (D. Nev. Mar. 9, 2011)
Case details for

HORA v. CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Case Details

Full title:DONALD HORA and ELENA HORA, Plaintiffs, v. CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON…

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Mar 9, 2011

Citations

Case No.: 2:09-cv-02267-GMN-PAL (D. Nev. Mar. 9, 2011)