From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hopson v. Smyth

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 14, 1950
182 F.2d 936 (4th Cir. 1950)

Opinion

No. 6084.

Argued June 12, 1950.

Decided June 14, 1950.

Bud Hopson, pro se.

Frederick T. Gray, Assistant Attorney General of Virginia (J. Lindsay Almond, Jr., Attorney General of Virginia, on brief), for appellee.

Before PARKER, Chief Judge, DOBIE, Circuit Judge, and WYCHE, District Judge.


This is an appeal in a habeas corpus case. The appellant is held in custody under the judgment of a Virginia state court; and it appears not only that there is no merit in his petition but also that he has not exhausted his remedies under state law. The order of the lower court would, therefore, be affirmed if the appeal were properly before us. Darr v. Burford, 339 U.S. 200, 70 S.Ct. 587; Washington v. Smyth, 4 Cir., 167 F.2d 658. It is not properly before us, however, because not supported by a certificate of probable cause as required by 28 U.S.C.A. § 2253, and must accordingly be dismissed. Bernard v. Brady, 4 Cir., 164 F.2d 881.

Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

Hopson v. Smyth

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 14, 1950
182 F.2d 936 (4th Cir. 1950)
Case details for

Hopson v. Smyth

Case Details

Full title:HOPSON v. SMYTH

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jun 14, 1950

Citations

182 F.2d 936 (4th Cir. 1950)

Citing Cases

Lyle v. Eidson

In the absence of the issuance of a certificate of probable cause, the order of the District Court is not…

Harris v. Ellis

In the absence of a certificate of probable cause, the order of the district court is not reviewable by this…