From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hopson v. McDonough

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
May 11, 2007
Case No. 3:07cv130/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. May. 11, 2007)

Opinion

Case No. 3:07cv130/MCR/EMT.

May 11, 2007


ORDER


This cause is before the court upon Petitioner's "Motion for Re-Hearing" (received by the clerk on May 9, 2007), which the court will construe as a motion for reconsideration of this court's April 16, 2007 order denying appointment of counsel ( see Doc. 7).

Petitioner has failed to show that the order issued April 16, 2007 was clearly erroneous or contrary to law; therefore, the motion for reconsideration shall be denied. Plaintiff is advised that she may obtain review of an order of this court on any pretrial matter by filing a motion for reconsideration with the district court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), in which she must show that this court's order was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The clerk is directed to docket Petitioner's "Motion for Re-Hearing" (received by the clerk on May 9, 2007).

2. Petitioner's motion, construed as a motion for reconsideration, is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hopson v. McDonough

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
May 11, 2007
Case No. 3:07cv130/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. May. 11, 2007)
Case details for

Hopson v. McDonough

Case Details

Full title:KIMBERLY HOPSON, Petitioner, v. JAMES R. McDONOUGH, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: May 11, 2007

Citations

Case No. 3:07cv130/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. May. 11, 2007)