From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hoppmann v. Pampered Pets & Plants Inc.

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Feb 23, 2024
No. CV-22-00427-PHX-DWL (D. Ariz. Feb. 23, 2024)

Opinion

CV-22-00427-PHX-DWL

02-23-2024

Sandra S Hoppmann, Plaintiff, v. Pampered Pets & Plants Incorporated, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Dominic W. Lanza, United States District Judge

On February 14, 2024, the Court issued an order requiring Defendant Susan Hall, who is proceeding pro se, to show cause why a default judgment as to liability should not be entered against her as a result of her failure to attend a pre-trial hearing scheduled for February 14, 2024, the purpose of which was to discuss a potential trial date and the prospects of settlement. (Doc. 66.) Hall has now filed a response to the order to show cause in which she provides an explanation for her failure to attend the hearing and “propose[s] a less excessive sanction which would compensate [Plaintiff] for her expense in attending the hearing on February 14, 2024”-namely, “the payment to [Plaintiff] in the amount of $86.98,” which consists of the typical $40/day witness attendance fee in federal court and reimbursement for Plaintiff's mileage. (Doc. 68.)

The Court is satisfied with Hall's explanation for missing the hearing, agrees with Hall that a sanction of default judgment would be excessive and unwarranted under these circumstances, and further agrees with Hall that the proposed alternative sanction of a compensatory payment to Plaintiff is better calibrated to remedy the harm. However, because it is not entirely clear that Hall's mileage and mileage rate calculations are correct, and because Hall's proposed sum does not factor in parking, the Court concludes that a better figure is an even $100.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The order to show cause (Doc. 66) is discharged.

2. The status conference is reset for March 6, 2024 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 601 of the Sandra Day O'Connor United States Courthouse. As before, both sides must be prepared to discuss how long they anticipate the trial will last and when they will be prepared to go to trial. Additionally, both sides must be prepared to discuss whether they are amenable to another referral to a magistrate judge for a settlement conference, which the Court strongly recommends they consider.

3. Hall is ordered to pay $100 to Plaintiff.


Summaries of

Hoppmann v. Pampered Pets & Plants Inc.

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Feb 23, 2024
No. CV-22-00427-PHX-DWL (D. Ariz. Feb. 23, 2024)
Case details for

Hoppmann v. Pampered Pets & Plants Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Sandra S Hoppmann, Plaintiff, v. Pampered Pets & Plants Incorporated, et…

Court:United States District Court, District of Arizona

Date published: Feb 23, 2024

Citations

No. CV-22-00427-PHX-DWL (D. Ariz. Feb. 23, 2024)