From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hopper v. Newsom

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 24, 2022
2:20-CV-1802-KJM-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 24, 2022)

Opinion

2:20-CV-1802-KJM-DMC-P

06-24-2022

DOUGLAS L. HOPPER, Plaintiff, v. GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

DENNIS M. COTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's fifth motion, ECF No. 25, for an extension of time to file a second amended complaint. Good cause appearing therefor based on Plaintiff's declaration regarding a recent positive COVID-19 diagnosis and resulting quarantine, Plaintiff's motion is granted. Plaintiff shall file a second amended complaint within 60 days of the date of this order. Further requests for additional time will be highly disfavored and only granted upon an extraordinary showing of need.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 1


Summaries of

Hopper v. Newsom

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 24, 2022
2:20-CV-1802-KJM-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 24, 2022)
Case details for

Hopper v. Newsom

Case Details

Full title:DOUGLAS L. HOPPER, Plaintiff, v. GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 24, 2022

Citations

2:20-CV-1802-KJM-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 24, 2022)