From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hopper v. Kibler

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 21, 2021
2:21-cv-00985-JDP (HC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 21, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-00985-JDP (HC)

06-21-2021

DOUGLAS LEE HOPPER, Petitioner, v. BRIAN KIBLER, Respondent.


ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONER TO FILE AN APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS OR PAY THE FILING FEE

JEREMY D. PETERSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has not, however, filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the required filing fee ($5.00). See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a); 1915(a). Petitioner will be provided the opportunity to either submit the appropriate affidavit in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis or submit the appropriate filing fee.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee.

2. Petitioner's failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hopper v. Kibler

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 21, 2021
2:21-cv-00985-JDP (HC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 21, 2021)
Case details for

Hopper v. Kibler

Case Details

Full title:DOUGLAS LEE HOPPER, Petitioner, v. BRIAN KIBLER, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 21, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-00985-JDP (HC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 21, 2021)