From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hopper-Layne v. Floyd

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE
Jun 7, 2013
3:13-cv-31 (E.D. Tenn. Jun. 7, 2013)

Opinion

3:13-cv-31

06-07-2013

JAMES HOPPER-LAYNE, Plaintiff, v. DUSTIN FLOYD, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM

On May 9, 2013, plaintiff was ordered to complete and return the service packet for defendant Floyd within 20 days. Plaintiff was forewarned that failure to return the completed service packet could jeopardize his prosecution of this action. Plaintiff has failed to return the service packet or otherwise respond to the order of this court. Therefore, this action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, sua sponte, for failure to prosecute and to comply with the orders of this court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Jourdan v. Jabe, 951 F.2d 108 (6th Cir. 1991). The court will CERTIFY that any appeal from this action would not be taken in good faith and would be totally frivolous. See Fed. R. App. P. 24.

AN APPROPRIATE ORDER WILL ENTER.

Thomas W. Phillips

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Hopper-Layne v. Floyd

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE
Jun 7, 2013
3:13-cv-31 (E.D. Tenn. Jun. 7, 2013)
Case details for

Hopper-Layne v. Floyd

Case Details

Full title:JAMES HOPPER-LAYNE, Plaintiff, v. DUSTIN FLOYD, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE

Date published: Jun 7, 2013

Citations

3:13-cv-31 (E.D. Tenn. Jun. 7, 2013)