From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hopo Corp. v. Keller

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 7, 2001
798 So. 2d 889 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Summary

quashing trial court's order denying the motion to dissolve the lis pendens filed against HOPO because HOPO had not been joined as a party in the pending dissolution of marriage action

Summary of this case from Loidl v. I E Group, Inc.

Opinion

No. 4D01-2622.

November 7, 2001.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Edward H. Fine, Judge; L.T. Case No. CL 01-4236 AI.

Kenneth G. Spillias and Glenn E. Thomas of Lewis, Longman Walker, P.A., West Palm Beach, for petitioner.

Martin L. Haines, III, of Martin L. Haines, III, Chartered, Lake Park, for respondent.


Petitioner, HOPO Corporation, seeks certiorari review of an order denying its motion to dissolve a lis pendens. See Archer v. Archer, 692 So.2d 1009 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Based on our decision in Marbin v. Cohen, 789 So.2d 1193 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), we grant the petition as HOPO Corporation has not been joined as a party in the pending dissolution of marriage action. We quash the trial court's order denying the motion to dissolve HOPO's lis pendens; the motion should have been granted.

POLEN, C.J., STEVENSON and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hopo Corp. v. Keller

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 7, 2001
798 So. 2d 889 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

quashing trial court's order denying the motion to dissolve the lis pendens filed against HOPO because HOPO had not been joined as a party in the pending dissolution of marriage action

Summary of this case from Loidl v. I E Group, Inc.

quashing trial court's order denying the motion to dissolve the lis pendens filed against HOPO because HOPO had not been joined as a party in the pending dissolution of marriage action

Summary of this case from Loidl v. I E Group, Inc.
Case details for

Hopo Corp. v. Keller

Case Details

Full title:HOPO CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. Rosemarie B. KELLER, Respondent

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Nov 7, 2001

Citations

798 So. 2d 889 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Citing Cases

Loidl v. I E Group, Inc.

Where the property owner is not named as a party to the action in the complaint, any lis pendens filed…

Loidl v. I E Group, Inc.

However, I E had argued both in its motion to dissolve the notices of lis pendens and at the hearing on the…