From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hopkins v. Webb

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jun 12, 2012
Case No. 08-12114 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 12, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 08-12114

06-12-2012

LEMONT HOPKINS, Plaintiff v. VIRGIL B. WEBB, K. WRIGHT, B. BUNKE, and KATHY WOLFE, Defendants.


Honorable David M. Lawson


ORDER CONSTRUING LETTER AS MOTION TO WAIVE FILING FEE AND

DENYING MOTION TO WAIVE FILING FEE

The plaintiff, Lemont Hopkins, currently incarcerated at the Michigan Reformatory in Ionia, Michigan, filed a pro se action for violations of his civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court granted the plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. In substance, the plaintiff wished to challenge the terms of his sentence, arguing that his minimum sentence was increased improperly due to a parole violation. After careful consideration of the petitioner's claims, the Court dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) as failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted because habeas corpus provided the only avenue of relief. The Court declined to construe the complaint as a habeas corpus petition because the petitioner did not allege that his claims were exhausted and because the petitioner might have wanted to assert additional or different claims. Presently, the matter is before the Court because the plaintiff wrote the Court asking to suspend all further withdrawals from his inmate account. The Court will construe the plaintiff's letter as a motion to waive the filing fee.

The plaintiff asserts that he should not be required to pay the full filing fee because his case was dismissed summarily just days after he was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The petitioner's request must be denied. The plaintiff was assessed the filing fee in accordance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act, see 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b), and the requirement to pay the filing fee is not waived simply because the suit was meritless.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the petitioner's request to suspend further withdrawals from his inmate account [dkt. #7], which the Court construed as a motion to waive the filing fee, is DENIED.

_________________________

DAVID M. LAWSON

United States District Judge

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on June 12, 2012.

_________________________

DEBORAH R. TOFIL


Summaries of

Hopkins v. Webb

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jun 12, 2012
Case No. 08-12114 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 12, 2012)
Case details for

Hopkins v. Webb

Case Details

Full title:LEMONT HOPKINS, Plaintiff v. VIRGIL B. WEBB, K. WRIGHT, B. BUNKE, and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 12, 2012

Citations

Case No. 08-12114 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 12, 2012)