From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hopkins v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States
Jan 21, 2009
555 U.S. 1132 (2009)

Summary

remanding a career offender case for consideration after the Supreme Court's ACCA opinion in Chambers v. United States, 555 U.S. 122

Summary of this case from United States v. Marrero

Opinion

No. 07–11355.

2009-01-21

George HOPKINS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.


Case below, 264 Fed.Appx. 173.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit for further consideration in light of Chambers v. United States, 555 U.S. ––––, 129 S.Ct. 687, ––– L.Ed.2d –––– (2009).


Summaries of

Hopkins v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States
Jan 21, 2009
555 U.S. 1132 (2009)

remanding a career offender case for consideration after the Supreme Court's ACCA opinion in Chambers v. United States, 555 U.S. 122

Summary of this case from United States v. Marrero

remanding a career offender case for consideration after the Supreme Court's ACCA opinion in Chambers v. United States, 555 U.S. 122, 129 S.Ct. 687, 172 L.Ed.2d 484

Summary of this case from United States v. Marrero

remanding a career offender case for consideration after the Supreme Court's ACCA opinion in Chambers v. United States, 555 U.S. 122, 129 S.Ct. 687, 172 L.Ed.2d 484

Summary of this case from United States v. Marrero
Case details for

Hopkins v. United States

Case Details

Full title:George HOPKINS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Jan 21, 2009

Citations

555 U.S. 1132 (2009)
129 S. Ct. 995
173 L. Ed. 2d 285
77 U.S.L.W. 3428

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Hopkins

United States v. Hopkins, 264 Fed.Appx. 173, 176 (3d Cir. 2008). Hopkins sought relief from the Supreme…

United States v. O'Neal

The Third Circuit Court of Appeals has consistently relied on authority interpreting the Armed Career…