From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hopkins v. Hopkins

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 23, 1983
308 S.E.2d 426 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983)

Opinion

67033.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 23, 1983.

Declaratory judgment. Cobb Superior Court. Before Judge Robinson.

J. Al Cochran, James R. Whitfield, for appellant.

Glen E. Stinson, for appellee.


The defendant appeals a judgment for $1300 in favor of the plaintiff. Three errors are enumerated: 1) the award of money damages in an action seeking declaratory relief is contrary to law; 2) the award of money damages under the theory of trover is contrary to law; 3) the determination by the trial court that the complaint was an action for trover is not supported by the evidence or pleadings.

The complaint alleged that after the parties' divorce certain property not provided for in the divorce decree and alleged to be solely owned by the plaintiff was still in the defendant's possession. It concluded by alleging "plaintiff shows that she is entitled to a declaration of her rights as to this property and the return thereof or to be paid for this property's reasonable value." Among the prayers of the complaint were included the following: "That the court enter a judgment in said matter declaring the rights of plaintiff to be that the property owned and paid for by the plaintiff which is or was in the possession of the defendant should be rendered to the plaintiff or that the defendant should pay to the plaintiff the reasonable value of this property." The complaint also sought "such other and further relief as to the court may seem just and proper." Held:

There is no transcript of the proceedings below. Since this cause was tried and was not a default proceeding (compare Stroud v. Elias, 247 Ga. 191 ( 275 S.E.2d 46)), the rule enunciated in Jackson v. Jackson, 243 Ga. 338 ( 253 S.E.2d 758) is applicable here. "In the absence of a transcript, we must assume that evidence amended the pleadings under Code Ann. § 81A-115 (now OCGA § 9-11-15) and authorized the verdict rendered."

The pleadings in the case sub judice were sufficient to authorize the money judgment awarded by the trial judge sitting without a jury.

Judgment affirmed. Sognier and Pope, JJ., concur.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 23, 1983.


Summaries of

Hopkins v. Hopkins

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 23, 1983
308 S.E.2d 426 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983)
Case details for

Hopkins v. Hopkins

Case Details

Full title:HOPKINS v. HOPKINS

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Sep 23, 1983

Citations

308 S.E.2d 426 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983)
308 S.E.2d 426

Citing Cases

Ticor Constr. Co. v. Brown

Where no transcript exists, we normally assume that the evidence amended the pleadings to conform to the…

Gregg v. Barnes

Since no objection to the legitimation appears of record, we must assume that the evidence supported the…