From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hopkins v. Hill

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Aug 6, 2024
4:22-CV-01251-JM-BBM (E.D. Ark. Aug. 6, 2024)

Opinion

4:22-CV-01251-JM-BBM

08-06-2024

JAMES LEWIS HOPKINS ADC #185090 PLAINTIFF v. HILL, Sergeant, Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility; and DEVORE, Deputy, Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility DEFENDANTS


ORDER

The Court has received a Recommendation for dismissal from Magistrate Judge Benecia B. Moore. No objections have been filed, and the time to do so has now passed. After careful review of the Recommendation and the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Recommendation should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted as this Court's findings in its entirety.

Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 31) is GRANTED. Plaintiff James Lewis Hopkins's Complaint, First Amended Complaint, and Second Amended Complaint (Docs. 3, 4, 7) are DISMISSED, without prejudice, for failure to exhaust available administrative remedies.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hopkins v. Hill

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Aug 6, 2024
4:22-CV-01251-JM-BBM (E.D. Ark. Aug. 6, 2024)
Case details for

Hopkins v. Hill

Case Details

Full title:JAMES LEWIS HOPKINS ADC #185090 PLAINTIFF v. HILL, Sergeant, Pulaski…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Aug 6, 2024

Citations

4:22-CV-01251-JM-BBM (E.D. Ark. Aug. 6, 2024)