From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hopkins v. Fla. P P Comm'n

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Nov 24, 1982
422 So. 2d 1014 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Opinion

No. AL-373.

November 24, 1982.

Appeal from the Parole and Probation Commission.

Roosevelt Hopkins, pro se, appellant.

John C. Courtney, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Florida Parole and Probation Com'n, Tallahassee, for appellee.


Appellant contends the Parole and Probation Commission (Commission) erred in assigning his presumptive parole release date (PPRD). We disagree and affirm.

Application of objective parole guidelines to appellant's 1965 convictions does not violate the ex post facto clause. See Lopez v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 410 So.2d 1354 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

The Commission properly used the most severe crime to determine the salient factor score, then used the other counts as aggravating factors to determine appellant's PPRD for the 1965 convictions. Fla. Admin. Code Rule 23-21.10(4)(a)(1)(h).

SHAW and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hopkins v. Fla. P P Comm'n

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Nov 24, 1982
422 So. 2d 1014 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
Case details for

Hopkins v. Fla. P P Comm'n

Case Details

Full title:ROOSEVELT HOPKINS, APPELLANT, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Nov 24, 1982

Citations

422 So. 2d 1014 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)