From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hopkins v. Dean

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Sep 3, 2024
4:23-cv-00906-KGB (E.D. Ark. Sep. 3, 2024)

Opinion

4:23-cv-00906-KGB

09-03-2024

JAMES LEWIS HOPKINS #185090 PLAINTIFF v. DEAN, et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

KRISTINE G. BAKER CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney (Dkt. No. 8). Plaintiff James Lewis Hopkins has not filed any objections, and the time to file objections has passed. Accordingly, after careful consideration, the Court approves and adopts the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects (Id.). The Court dismisses this action without prejudice for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. The relief requested is denied (Dkt. Nos. 2, 7). The Court recommends that this dismissal count as a “strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Gonzalez v. United States, 23 F.4th 788, 789-91 (8th Cir. 2022). The Clerk is directed to close the case. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.

It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Hopkins v. Dean

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Sep 3, 2024
4:23-cv-00906-KGB (E.D. Ark. Sep. 3, 2024)
Case details for

Hopkins v. Dean

Case Details

Full title:JAMES LEWIS HOPKINS #185090 PLAINTIFF v. DEAN, et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Sep 3, 2024

Citations

4:23-cv-00906-KGB (E.D. Ark. Sep. 3, 2024)