From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hope v. Seaman

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 9, 1912
97 N.E. 1118 (N.Y. 1912)

Opinion

Argued December 20, 1911

Decided January 9, 1912

G.P. Foulk and John C. Loud for appellants.

Charles G.F. Wahle and H. Lionel Kringel for respondent.


Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against appellants on the stipulation, with costs in all courts; no opinion.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., GRAY, WERNER, WILLARD BARTLETT, HISCOCK, CHASE and COLLIN, JJ.


Summaries of

Hope v. Seaman

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 9, 1912
97 N.E. 1118 (N.Y. 1912)
Case details for

Hope v. Seaman

Case Details

Full title:SARAH E. HOPE, Respondent, v . CHARLES O. SEAMAN et al., Appellants…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 9, 1912

Citations

97 N.E. 1118 (N.Y. 1912)
97 N.E. 1118

Citing Cases

Raymond v. Fogarty

Of equal, if not prior, importance in each action are the material issues of whether the Statute of…

Leahy v. Hardy

It is ancient law that where there has been no guardian ad litem appointed for an infant, an appearance in…