From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hope v. Board of Pardons Paroles

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division
May 9, 2006
Civil Action No. 1:06-CV-175 (E.D. Tex. May. 9, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 1:06-CV-175.

May 9, 2006


MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


Plaintiff Orthella Hope, a prisoner confined at the Dawson State Jail, proceeding pro se, filed this civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, Rissie Owens, and Gerald Carrett. Plaintiff requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

The court ordered that this matter be referred to the Honorable Keith F. Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The magistrate judge recommends dismissing the action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) as frivolous and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record, pleadings and all available evidence. No objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge were filed by the parties.

ORDER

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct and the report of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the magistrate judge's recommendation.


Summaries of

Hope v. Board of Pardons Paroles

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division
May 9, 2006
Civil Action No. 1:06-CV-175 (E.D. Tex. May. 9, 2006)
Case details for

Hope v. Board of Pardons Paroles

Case Details

Full title:ORTHELLA HOPE v. BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, ET AL

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division

Date published: May 9, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 1:06-CV-175 (E.D. Tex. May. 9, 2006)

Citing Cases

Hope v. Boling

As a result, Section 1915(g) is applicable. See Hope v. Jones, Civil Action No. 1:04cv462 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 17,…