From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hoover v. Knipp

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 11, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-0662 MCE GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 11, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-0662 MCE GGH P

09-11-2012

MICHAEL A. HOOVER, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM KNIPP, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

This petition for writ of habeas corpus was dismissed with prejudice by order filed on January 30, 2012, and judgment entered accordingly. Petitioner's filing, directed to a three-judge panel, filed on August 21, 2012, regarding, inter alia, a broken cooler in a vocational training class, not only does not appear to be one contemplated by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Federal Rules Governing § 2254 Cases, but is wholly otherwise inapposite in the context of this closed case. Therefore, this document will be placed in the file and disregarded.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Gregory G. Hollows

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Hoover v. Knipp

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 11, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-0662 MCE GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 11, 2012)
Case details for

Hoover v. Knipp

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL A. HOOVER, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM KNIPP, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 11, 2012

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-0662 MCE GGH P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 11, 2012)