Opinion
No. 1:04CV1047.
January 4, 2005
ORDER
On November 9, 2004, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed and notice was served on the parties in this action and a copy was given to the court.
Within the time limitation set forth in the statute, Plaintiff objected to the Recommendation.
The court will treat Plaintiff's "notices of appeal" as an Objection to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
The court has appropriately reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge's report to which objection was made and has made a de novo determination which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge's report. The court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge's recommendation. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's complaint [Pleading no. 2] be DISMISSED as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). A judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order.