From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hooten v. Fowlkes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION
Mar 5, 2013
CIVIL ACTION No. 5:11-CV-115 (CAR) (M.D. Ga. Mar. 5, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION No. 5:11-CV-115 (CAR)

03-05-2013

MARK HOOTEN, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH FOWLKES, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ON RECOMMENDATION

Before the Court is the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge [Doc. 67] to grant Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 62] because no genuine issues of material fact exist for trial. No objection was filed, and having considered the matter, the Court agrees with the findings and conclusions of the United States Magistrate Judge. Therefore, the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED and MADE THE ORDER OF THE COURT. For the reasons set forth therein, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.

________________________

C. ASHLEY ROYAL, CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
BBP


Summaries of

Hooten v. Fowlkes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION
Mar 5, 2013
CIVIL ACTION No. 5:11-CV-115 (CAR) (M.D. Ga. Mar. 5, 2013)
Case details for

Hooten v. Fowlkes

Case Details

Full title:MARK HOOTEN, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH FOWLKES, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION

Date published: Mar 5, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION No. 5:11-CV-115 (CAR) (M.D. Ga. Mar. 5, 2013)