Opinion
8:24-cv-01038-AEP
09-05-2024
The parties consented to having a United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings (Doc. 1).
Anthony E. Porcelli, United Spates Magistrate Judge
This cause comes before the Court upon Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Entry of Judgment with Remand. (Doc. 12). The Commissioner contends that remand is appropriate under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) as it relates to judicial review of benefit determinations. (Doc. 12, at 1). Plaintiff does not object to the relief requested. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the Commissioner's motion, it is hereby
ORDERED:
1. Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Entry of Judgment with Remand (Doc. 12) is GRANTED.
2. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment for Plaintiff with instructions that the Commissioner's decision is REVERSED under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and the case is REMANDED for further administrative proceedings consistent with the reasons stated in the Commissioner's motion.
3. The Clerk is then directed to close the case.
DONE AND ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, this 5th day of September 2024.