From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hooper v. La. Pigment Co., LP

Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Apr 13, 2017
218 So. 3d 627 (La. 2017)

Opinion

NO. 2017–CC–0380

04-13-2017

Herman Lee HOOPER v. LOUISIANA PIGMENT COMPANY, LP


Granted in part. The judgment of the trial court granting the motion in limine is reversed insofar as it excludes evidence of the plaintiff's applications for disability benefits. See Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corp., 526 U.S. 795 (1999) ;

Smith v. Thurman Oils, Inc., 06–0743 (La.App. 1 Cir. 12/28/06), 951 So. 2d 359, writ denied, 07–0207 (La. 3/23/07), 951 So. 2d 1106. In all other respects, the writ is denied.


Summaries of

Hooper v. La. Pigment Co., LP

Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Apr 13, 2017
218 So. 3d 627 (La. 2017)
Case details for

Hooper v. La. Pigment Co., LP

Case Details

Full title:Herman Lee HOOPER v. LOUISIANA PIGMENT COMPANY, LP

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Date published: Apr 13, 2017

Citations

218 So. 3d 627 (La. 2017)

Citing Cases

Hooper v. La. Pigment Co.

Louisiana Pigment argues that the trial court erred when it excluded evidence of Hooper's disability…