From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hooper v. Adams

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Jun 18, 2010
NO. 3:08-1121 (M.D. Tenn. Jun. 18, 2010)

Summary

concluding that whether an award of attorney fees would decrease a plan's assets to pay benefits to other participants constituted a legitimate concern

Summary of this case from Bio-Medical Applications of Kentucky v. Coal Excl. Co.

Opinion

NO. 3:08-1121.

June 18, 2010


ORDER


In accordance with the Memorandum filed herewith, the Defendant's motion for attorney fees and expenses (Docket Entry No 49) is DENIED.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hooper v. Adams

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Jun 18, 2010
NO. 3:08-1121 (M.D. Tenn. Jun. 18, 2010)

concluding that whether an award of attorney fees would decrease a plan's assets to pay benefits to other participants constituted a legitimate concern

Summary of this case from Bio-Medical Applications of Kentucky v. Coal Excl. Co.
Case details for

Hooper v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:JOHN M. HOOPER, II and JOHN M. HOOPER, III, TRUSTEES OF THE TENNESSEE WINE…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division

Date published: Jun 18, 2010

Citations

NO. 3:08-1121 (M.D. Tenn. Jun. 18, 2010)

Citing Cases

Bio-Medical Applications of Kentucky v. Coal Excl. Co.

The CEB Plan covers over 700 employees and pays over $6 million in benefits annually. CEB nevertheless claims…