From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hooks v. Target Corp.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 1, 2024
5:22-cv-00052-SSS (SPx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 1, 2024)

Opinion

5:22-cv-00052-SSS (SPx)

07-01-2024

ADRIEANNA HOOKS, an individual, Plaintiff, v. TARGET CORPORATION, a Minnesota corporation, DBA Target, and DOES 1 through 10, Inclusive, Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE, PURSUANT TO FRCP RULE 41(a)(2)

HONORABLE SUNSHINE S. SYKES, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE.

Having reviewed and considered the Stipulation to Dismiss the Entire Action, With Prejudice Pursuant to FRCP Rule 41(a)(2) between the Parties and their respective counsel of record, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

(1) This entire action is dismissed, with prejudice, with each Party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs; and
(2) This Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Parties' settlement agreement.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hooks v. Target Corp.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 1, 2024
5:22-cv-00052-SSS (SPx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 1, 2024)
Case details for

Hooks v. Target Corp.

Case Details

Full title:ADRIEANNA HOOKS, an individual, Plaintiff, v. TARGET CORPORATION, a…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jul 1, 2024

Citations

5:22-cv-00052-SSS (SPx) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 1, 2024)