From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hooks v. Long

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 27, 2016
Case No. CV 15-00325 BRO (RAO) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 27, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. CV 15-00325 BRO (RAO)

10-27-2016

MELVIN KEITH HOOKS, Plaintiff, v. DAVID LONG, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, all of the other records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"). The time for filing objections to the Report has passed, and no objections have been filed. The Court hereby accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

Dated: October 27, 2016

/s/_________

HONORABLE BEVERLY REID O'CONNELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hooks v. Long

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 27, 2016
Case No. CV 15-00325 BRO (RAO) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 27, 2016)
Case details for

Hooks v. Long

Case Details

Full title:MELVIN KEITH HOOKS, Plaintiff, v. DAVID LONG, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 27, 2016

Citations

Case No. CV 15-00325 BRO (RAO) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 27, 2016)