Opinion
Argued November 24, 1902
Decided December 9, 1902
Eugene Van Voorhis for appellant.
William A. Sutherland for respondents.
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: PARKER, Ch. J., GRAY, O'BRIEN, MARTIN, VANN, CULLEN and WERNER, JJ.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Hooker v. City of Rochester
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 9, 1902
65 N.E. 1116 (N.Y. 1902)
Summaries of
Hooker v. City of Rochester
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 9, 1902
65 N.E. 1116 (N.Y. 1902)
Case details for
Hooker v. City of Rochester
Case Details
Full title:JAMES H. HOOKER, Appellant, v . THE CITY OF ROCHESTER et al., Respondents
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Dec 9, 1902
Citations
65 N.E. 1116 (N.Y. 1902)
172 N.Y. 665