Opinion
Argued March 10, 1891
Decided March 17, 1891
Henry J. Sullivan for appellant.
Eugene Van Voorhis for respondent.
ANDREWS, J., reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Order affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Hooker v. City of Rochester
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 17, 1891
26 N.E. 1043 (N.Y. 1891)
Summaries of
Hooker v. City of Rochester
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 17, 1891
26 N.E. 1043 (N.Y. 1891)
Case details for
Hooker v. City of Rochester
Case Details
Full title:JAMES H. HOOKER, Respondent, v . THE CITY OF ROCHESTER, Appellant
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Mar 17, 1891
Citations
26 N.E. 1043 (N.Y. 1891)
26 N.E. 1043
36 N.Y. St. Rptr. 458
Citing Cases
Johnson v. Purpura
It has been held, however, that where a verdict covers the whole ground of controversy on the facts, it will…