Opinion
Department 1. Appeal from the superior court of Monterey county.
COUNSEL
W. S. Dodge and H. V. Morehouse, for appellant.
J. Lee and A. S. Kittredge, for respondent.
OPINION
[2 Cal.Unrep. 460] THE COURT.
This is an appeal by plaintiff from an order granting a new trial. The action was tried by jury. Section 659 of the Code of Civil Procedure provides that the party intending to move for a new trial must, within 10 days after verdict, file with the clerk, and serve upon the adverse party, a notice of such intention. In the case before us, the notice of intention was filed more than 10 days after the verdict. It does not affirmatively appear that the court below attempted to extend the time for filing or serving the notice, and when he filed amendments to the proposed statement, on motion for new trial, the plaintiff reserved his objection that notice of intention was not filed within statutory time. But the right to move for a new trial is statutory, and there is no provision of the Code of Civil Procedure which gives to the superior court or to the judge power by order to extend the time for filing a notice of intention to move for a new trial. Section 1054 does not authorize such an order. With respect to ordinary notices the proof of the service is filed with the clerk for preservation, but with respect to notices of intention to move for new trial the statute specifically requires that they must be filed within the 10 days, as a prerequisite to any further proceedings towards obtaining a retrial. The insufficiency of the complaint cannot be considered on appeal from an order granting a new trial.
Order reversed.