From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hoogterp v. Attorney Grievance Comm'n

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Feb 4, 2019
SC: 158626 (Mich. Feb. 4, 2019)

Opinion

SC: 158626

02-04-2019

CAROL HOOGTERP, Plaintiff, v. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant.


Order

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices AGC: 16-0947

On order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief.

CAVANAGH, J., did not participate due to her prior service as a member of the Attorney Grievance Commission.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 4, 2019

/s/_________

Clerk


Summaries of

Hoogterp v. Attorney Grievance Comm'n

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Feb 4, 2019
SC: 158626 (Mich. Feb. 4, 2019)
Case details for

Hoogterp v. Attorney Grievance Comm'n

Case Details

Full title:CAROL HOOGTERP, Plaintiff, v. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant.

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Feb 4, 2019

Citations

SC: 158626 (Mich. Feb. 4, 2019)