From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hoogenstyn v. Orthopaedic Assocs. of Grand Rapids, PC

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Feb 20, 2018
SC: 156220 (Mich. Feb. 20, 2018)

Opinion

SC: 156220

02-20-2018

BRENDA HOOGENSTYN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ORTHOPAEDIC ASSOCIATES OF GRAND RAPIDS, PC, and JULIAN KUZ, M.D., Defendants-Appellees, and WALKER SURGICAL CENTER, LLC, and MICHAEL BURTON, Defendants.


Order

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Kurtis T. Wilder Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices COA: 332063
Kent CC: 14-010008-NH

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 20, 2017 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 20, 2018

/s/_________

Clerk


Summaries of

Hoogenstyn v. Orthopaedic Assocs. of Grand Rapids, PC

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Feb 20, 2018
SC: 156220 (Mich. Feb. 20, 2018)
Case details for

Hoogenstyn v. Orthopaedic Assocs. of Grand Rapids, PC

Case Details

Full title:BRENDA HOOGENSTYN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ORTHOPAEDIC ASSOCIATES OF GRAND…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Feb 20, 2018

Citations

SC: 156220 (Mich. Feb. 20, 2018)