From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hood v. Water Treatment & Controls Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Nov 22, 2016
CIVIL ACTION 16-235-SDD-RLB (M.D. La. Nov. 22, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION 16-235-SDD-RLB C/W: 16-256 C/W: 16-255

11-22-2016

CASEY HOOD, ET AL. v. WATER TREATMENT AND CONTROLS COMPANY


RULING

The Court, after carefully considering the Petition, the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. dated September 23, 2016, to which no objection has been filed, hereby approves the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and adopts it as the Court's opinion herein.

Rec. Doc. 1-2.

Rec. Doc. 66.

ACCORDINGLY, the Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand is DENIED.

Rec. Doc. 19. --------

Baton Rouge, Louisiana the 22 day of November, 2016.

/s/ _________

SHELLY D. DICK, DISTRICT JUDGE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

Hood v. Water Treatment & Controls Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Nov 22, 2016
CIVIL ACTION 16-235-SDD-RLB (M.D. La. Nov. 22, 2016)
Case details for

Hood v. Water Treatment & Controls Co.

Case Details

Full title:CASEY HOOD, ET AL. v. WATER TREATMENT AND CONTROLS COMPANY

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Nov 22, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION 16-235-SDD-RLB (M.D. La. Nov. 22, 2016)

Citing Cases

Safranek v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co.

Plaintiffs contend that USAA has not established that the claims at issue will meet the jurisdictional…

Safranek v. Nat'l Gen. Ins. Co.

Plaintiffs contend that USAA has not established that the claims at issue will meet the jurisdictional…