From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hood v. Wallace

U.S.
May 27, 1901
182 U.S. 555 (1901)

Opinion

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

No. 179.

Argued March 11, 1901. Decided May 27, 1901.

Lantry v. Wallace, ante 536, followed.

THE case is stated in the opinion.

The counsel were the same as in Lantry v. Wallace, and the two cases were argued together.


The pleadings in this case are the same as in Lantry v. Wallace, just decided. The demurrer to the answer and cross-petition of Hood was sustained in an elaborate opinion by Judge Phillips, holding the Circuit Court. 89 F. 11. The judgment in that court was affirmed in the Circuit Court of Appeals. Lantry v. Wallace, 97 F. 865.

For the reasons stated in the opinion just rendered in Lantry's case, the judgment in this case is

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Hood v. Wallace

U.S.
May 27, 1901
182 U.S. 555 (1901)
Case details for

Hood v. Wallace

Case Details

Full title:HOOD v . WALLACE

Court:U.S.

Date published: May 27, 1901

Citations

182 U.S. 555 (1901)
21 S. Ct. 885

Citing Cases

Commissioner of Banks v. Cosmopolitan Tr. Co.

d not only for their protection but to give confidence to all dealing with national banks in respect of their…

Williams v. Stone

sion of the question presented here is found in Scott v. Deweese, 181 U.S. 202, 21 S. Ct. 585, 45 L. Ed. 822.…