Hood v. State

Full title: Vincent HOOD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Date published: Jun 12, 2018

548 S.W.3d 929 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

ED 105578

06-12-2018

Vincent HOOD, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Gwenda R. Robinson, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant. Joshua D. Hawley, Garrick F. D. Aplin, PO Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Gwenda R. Robinson, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.

Joshua D. Hawley, Garrick F. D. Aplin, PO Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before: Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., P.J., Robert M. Clayton III, J., and Angela T. Quigless, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Vincent Hood appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his motion filed pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 29.15 (2015). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2017).