Opinion
Argued May 4, 1917
Decided May 22, 1917
Amos Van Etten for appellant.
N.A. Calkins for respondent.
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., COLLIN, CARDOZO, POUND, McLAUGHLIN, CRANE and ANDREWS, JJ.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Hood v. New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Co.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 22, 1917
116 N.E. 1051 (N.Y. 1917)
Summaries of
Hood v. New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Co.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 22, 1917
116 N.E. 1051 (N.Y. 1917)
Case details for
Hood v. New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Co.
Case Details
Full title:HENRY E. HOOD, Respondent, v . NEW YORK CENTRAL AND HUDSON RIVER RAILROAD…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: May 22, 1917
Citations
116 N.E. 1051 (N.Y. 1917)
116 N.E. 1051
Citing Cases
Pro-Fac Cooperative v. B. O.R.R
But where, as here, the use originally arises from statutory permission, such use is presumed to continue…
Jenkins v. New York Central R.R. Co.Defendant argues, at least obliquely, that a railroad is virtually immune from the attachment of a…