From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hood v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION
Feb 3, 2014
1:13-cv-270- SEB-MJD (S.D. Ind. Feb. 3, 2014)

Opinion

1:13-cv-270- SEB-MJD

02-03-2014

JIMMY L. HOOD, JR., Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner for the Social Security Administration, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court, having reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation at Docket No. 25 and observing that no party objected to it within the time permitted under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), finds said Report and Recommendation is sound and well-reasoned and adopts it as the ruling of this Court.

Accordingly, the Commissioner's decision denying Plaintiff's application for Disability Insurance Benefits ("DIB") under Title II and Supplemental Security Income ("SSI") under Title XVI of the Social Security Act is REVERSED. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment filed at Docket No. 17 is GRANTED, and this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner to resolve the inconsistencies addressed in the ruling at Docket No. 25 and make a new residual functional capacity ("RFC") determination.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________

SARAH EVANS BARKER, JUDGE

United States District Court

Southern District of Indiana
Copies to: Thomas E. Kieper
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
tom.kieper@usdoj.gov
Karl E. Osterhout
OSTERHOUT DISABILITY LAW, LLC
karl@mydisabilityattorney.com


Summaries of

Hood v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION
Feb 3, 2014
1:13-cv-270- SEB-MJD (S.D. Ind. Feb. 3, 2014)
Case details for

Hood v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:JIMMY L. HOOD, JR., Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

Date published: Feb 3, 2014

Citations

1:13-cv-270- SEB-MJD (S.D. Ind. Feb. 3, 2014)

Citing Cases

Wright v. Colvin

I note also that the plaintiff's argument that Social Security Ruling 13-2p imposes "an additional and even…