From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hood v. Caruso

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Nov 17, 2006
Case No. 1:06-CV-589 (W.D. Mich. Nov. 17, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 1:06-CV-589.

November 17, 2006


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


The Court has before it a document filed by Plaintiff regarding the report and recommendation dated October 2, 2006, in which Magistrate Judge Brenneman recommended that Plaintiff's complaint be dismissed without prejudice for failure to demonstrate exhaustion as required by 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). In this document, Plaintiff states as follows: "I will not object to the recommendation to dismiss this case because I see what you mean now that I have to name the person in my grievance I intend to sue." In light of Plaintiff's statement that he does not object, the Court will adopt the report and recommendation. Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation issued October 2, 2006 (docket no. 4) is APPROVED AND ADOPTED as the Opinion of this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to demonstrate exhaustion as required by 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a).

This case is concluded.


Summaries of

Hood v. Caruso

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Nov 17, 2006
Case No. 1:06-CV-589 (W.D. Mich. Nov. 17, 2006)
Case details for

Hood v. Caruso

Case Details

Full title:JASON HOOD, Plaintiff, v. PATRICIA CARUSO, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Nov 17, 2006

Citations

Case No. 1:06-CV-589 (W.D. Mich. Nov. 17, 2006)

Citing Cases

Jones v. Treadeau

The question whether to apply the partial exhaustion rule or the total exhaustion rule in prisoner cases is…