Hood v. Bottling Co.

2 Citing cases

  1. Threatt v. Express Agency

    19 S.E.2d 873 (N.C. 1942)   Cited 2 times

    The record suggests that the demurrer to the evidence should be sustained, if not upon the principal issue of liability, then upon the ground of contributory negligence. Swainey v. Tea Co., 202 N.C. 272, 162 S.E. 557; Miller v. Holland, 196 N.C. 739, 147 S.E. 8. Cf. Wooten v. Smith, 215 N.C. 48, 200 S.E. 921; Hood v. Bottling Co., 192 N.C. 827, 135 S.E. 609. Both the driver of the truck and the plaintiff were charged with the mutual and reciprocal duty to exercise reasonable care under the circumstances arising from the exigencies of traffic in the street.

  2. Cureton v. Moore

    55 N.C. 204 (N.C. 1855)   Cited 1 times

    Per curiam. Bill dismissed. Cited: Leak v. Armfield, 187 N.C. 628; McGehee v. McGehee, 189 N.C. 565; Griffin v. Griffin, 191 N.C. 230; Harvey v. Tull, 192 N.C. 827.