From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Honig v. Rensselaer County Legislature

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 25, 1971
37 A.D.2d 658 (N.Y. App. Div. 1971)

Opinion

June 25, 1971


Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered June 17, 1971 in Rensselaer County, which rejected a plan for reapportionment adopted and submitted by the Rensselaer County Legislature pursuant to a prior direction of the court and approved a plan submitted by plaintiff as an interim measure. While a plan adopted by the representative body is preferable, the Legislature's plan was properly rejected in that its population figures for districts 2 and 3 were not based on a Federal census ( Seaman v. Fedourich, 16 N.Y.2d 94, 104; Thayer v. Garraghan, 28 A.D.2d 584). The plan approved is not constitutionally defective because of the minor population variance involved ( Abate v. Mundt, 25 N.Y.2d 309, affd. 403 U.S. 182). Judgment affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P.J., Reynolds, Greenblott, Sweeney and Simons, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Honig v. Rensselaer County Legislature

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 25, 1971
37 A.D.2d 658 (N.Y. App. Div. 1971)
Case details for

Honig v. Rensselaer County Legislature

Case Details

Full title:NEDDA R. HONIG, on Behalf of Herself and All Other Residents of the County…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 25, 1971

Citations

37 A.D.2d 658 (N.Y. App. Div. 1971)

Citing Cases

Brooklyn Assn. v. Macchiarola

We do not dispute the fact that keeping census tabulation blocks intact is preferable when district voting…

Valentino v. County of Tompkins

In addition, the County's redistricting plan is governed by the County Charter, not by the provisions of the…