From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Honeywell International v. Nokia Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Dec 16, 2010
400 F. App'x 557 (Fed. Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 2010-1121.

November 1, 2010. Rehearing Denied December 16, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in consolidated Case Nos. 04-CV-1337, 04-CV-1338, 04-CV-1536, and 05-CV-0874, Judge Joseph J. Farnan, Jr.

Martin R. Lueck, Robins, Kaplan, Miller Ciresi L.L.P., of Minneapolis, MN, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief were Matthew L. Woods and Stacie E. Oberts.

Lawrence Rosenthal, Stroock Stroock Lavan LLP, of New York, NY, argued for defendants-appellees Fujifilm Corporation, et al. With him on the brief were Ian G. Dibernardo, Angie M. Hankins, and Matthew W. Siegal.

Stephen S. Korniczky, Sheppard, Mullin, Richter Hampton LLP, of San Diego, CA, argued for defendants-appellees Samsung SDI America Inc., et al.

Before NEWMAN, LINN, and PROST, Circuit Judges.


JUDGMENT


THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.


Summaries of

Honeywell International v. Nokia Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Dec 16, 2010
400 F. App'x 557 (Fed. Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Honeywell International v. Nokia Corp.

Case Details

Full title:HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC., and Honeywell Intellectual Properties Inc.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Dec 16, 2010

Citations

400 F. App'x 557 (Fed. Cir. 2010)

Citing Cases

Orbis Corp. v. Rehrig Pac. Co.

Finally, it is very important to note that acceptance of an offer is not required. “Rather, the focus of the…

Minitube of Am., Inc. v. Reprod. Provisions, LLC

Finally, it is very important to note that acceptance of an offer is not required. "Rather, the focus of the…