Honeyman v. Gallagher

3 Citing cases

  1. Harjo v. Johnston

    19 P.2d 961 (Okla. 1933)   Cited 6 times

    5. Same — Dismissal of Appeal Where Errors Assigned not Presented by Transcript. "Where an appeal to this court is by transcript and the errors assigned are such that they could only be presented by the case-made or bill of exceptions, nothing is presented for review, and the appeal will be dismissed. Honeyman v. Gallagher, 144 Okla. 148, 289 P. 748." Dixon v. Walters, 160 Okla. 172, 16 P.2d 571.

  2. Dixon v. Walters

    16 P.2d 571 (Okla. 1932)   Cited 2 times

    "Where an appeal to this court is by transcript and the errors assigned are such that they could only be presented by the case-made or bill of exceptions, nothing is presented for review, and the appeal will be dismissed." Honeyman v. Gallagher, 144 Okla. 148, 289 P. 748. Appeal from District Court, Lincoln County; Hal Johnson, Judge.

  3. Carson v. Franklin

    213 P.2d 572 (Okla. 1950)

    The alleged error in this finding can only be determined on a review of the evidence presented by case-made or bill of exceptions. In Honeyman v. Gallagher, 144 Okla. 148, 289 P. 748, it is stated: "Where the appeal to this court is by transcript and the errors assigned are such that they could only be presented by case-made or bill of exceptions, nothing is presented for review, and the appeal will be dismissed."